Inlägg
av bigj5 » 29 juni 2003, 10:42
Hej här har du domen:
(International Court of Justice)
Internationella Domstolen i Haag, Nederländerna
Judgment of 27 June 1986
For its judgment on the merits in the case concerning military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua brought by Nicaragua against the United States of America, the Court was composed as follows:
President Nagendra Singh, Vice-President de Lacharrière; Judges Lachs, Ruda, Elias, Oda, Ago, Sette-Camara, Schwebel, Sir Robert Jennings, Mbaye, Bedjaoui, Ni, Evensen, Judge ad hoc Colliard
*
(1) By eleven votes to four,
Decides that in adjudicating the dispute brought before it by the Application filed by the Republic of Nicaragua on 9 April 1984, the Court is required to apply the "multilateral treaty reservation"contained in proviso (c) to the declaration of acceptance of jurisdiction made under Article 36, paragraph 2, of the Statute of the Court by the Government of the Untied States of America deposited on 26 August 1946;
(2) By twelve votes to three,
Rejects the justification of collective self-defence maintained by the United States of America in connection with the military and paramilitary activities in and against Nicaragua the subject of this case;
Avslår USA:s påstående att kollektivt självförsvar går att kombinera med stöd till paramilitära aktiviteter i Nicaragua (alltså i ett främmande land).
(3) By twelve votes to three,
Decides that the United States of America, by training, arming, equipping, financing and supplying the contra forces or otherwise encouraging, supporting and aiding military and paramilitary activities in and against Nicaragua, has acted, against the Republic of Nicaragua, in breach of its obligation under customary international law not to intervene in the affairs of another State;
Beslutade domstolen att USA, genom att träna, beväpna, utrusta, finansiera och stödja Contras liksom att på andra sätt stödja och militärt hjälpa paramilitära aktiviteter inne i och emot Nicaragua, har domstolen beslutat att internationell lag förbjuder detta. Man får inte intervenera mot en annan stat enligt internationell lag.
(4) By twelve votes to three,
Decides that the United States of America, by certain attacks on Nicaraguan territory in 1983-1984, namely attacks on Puerto Sandino on 13 September and 14 October 1983, an attack on Corinto on 10 October 1983; an attack on Potosi Naval Base on 4/5 January 1984, an attack on San Juan del Sur on 7 March 1984; attacks on patrol boats at Puerto Sandino on 28 and 30 March 1984; and an attack on San Juan del Norte on 9 April 1984; and further by those acts of intervention referred to in subparagraph (3) hereof which involve the use of force, has acted, against the Republic of Nicaragua, in breach of its obligation under customary international law not to use force against another State;
USA har, mot vad internationell lag tillåter, attackerat olika städer längs Nicaraguas kuster.
(5) By twelve votes to three,
Decides that the United States of America, by directing or authorizing over Rights of Nicaraguan territory, and by the acts imputable to the United States referred to in subparagraph (4) hereof, has acted, against the Republic of Nicaragua, in breach of its obligation under customary international law not to violate the sovereignty of another State;
USA har inte enligt internationell lag rätt att bruka våld mot en annan stat.
(6) By twelve votes to three,
Decides that, by laying mines in the internal or territorial waters of the Republic of Nicaragua during the first months of 1984, the United States of America has acted, against the Republic of Nicaragua, in breach of its obligations under customary international law not to use force against another State, not to intervene in its affairs, not to violate its sovereignty and not to interrupt peaceful maritime commerce;
Domstolen hävdar att det är förbjudet att minera andras territorialvatten, I detta fall Nicaragua, på det sätt som USA har gjort. Inte heller får man som USA, störa andra staters kommersiella aktiviteter ute på haven på det sätt som gjorts mot Nicaragua.
(7) By fourteen votes to one,
Decides that, by the acts referred to in subparagraph (6) hereof the United States of America has acted, against the Republic of Nicaragua, in breach of its obligations under Article XIX of the Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation between the United States of America and the Republic of Nicaragua signed at Managua on 21 January 1956
Domstolen beslutar även att USA har brutit mot ”Vänskaps, handels- och navigationspakten” med Nicaragua från 21 januari 1956.
(8) By fourteen votes to one,
Decides that the United States of America, by failing to make known the existence and location of the mines laid by it, referred to in subparagraph (6) hereof, has acted in breach of its obligations under customary international law in this respect
Domstolen beslutade att USA genom att minera vattnen (utanför Nicaraguas kuster) därmed har brutit mot internationell lag.
(9) By fourteen votes to one,
Finds that the United States of America, by producing in 1983 a manual entitled "Operaciones sicológicas en guerra de guerrillas", and disseminating it to contra forces, has encouraged the commission by them of acts contrary to general principles of humanitarian law; but does not find a basis for concluding that any such acts which may have been committed are imputable to the United States of America as acts of the United States of America;
Domstolen finner även att USA genom att producera en handbok med titeln ”Operaciones sicológicas en guerra de guerillas”, givit dessa till contrasstyrkorna. Innehållet i denna handbok strider mot de humanistiska principerna i den humanistiska lagen. Dock har man inte funnit bevis att det är USA som uppmanat Contras att använda den. (Något som är lätt att förneka, men att logik säger att denna handbok i tortyr och brott mot humanismen var ett led i USA:s krigföring). En av domarna var dock emot, och gick på linjen att USA var skyldigt även till detta.
(10) By twelve votes to three,
Decides that the United States of America, by the attacks on Nicaraguan territory referred to in subparagraph (4) hereof, and by declaring a general embargo on trade with Nicaragua on 1 May 1985, has committed acts calculated to deprive of its object and purpose the Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation between the Parties signed at Managua on 21 January 1956;
Domstolen anser att USA, med sina attacker mot nicaraguanskt territorium, bryter mot den pakt man slöt med Nicaragua år 1956.
(11) By twelve votes to three,
Decides that the United States of America, by the attacks on Nicaraguan territory referred to in subparagraph (4) hereof, and by declaring a general embargo on trade with Nicaragua on 1 May 1985, has acted in breach of its obligations under Article XIX of the Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation between the Parties signed at Managua on 21 January 1956;
Domstolen anser att USA brutit mot pakten med Nicaragua från år 1956, genom sina attacker och embargo mot samma land.
(12) By twelve votes to three,
Decides that the United States of America is under a duty immediately to cease and to refrain from all such acts as may constitute breaches of the foregoing legal obligations;
USA uppmanas att omedelbart sluta med den verksamhet som ovan har lagts landet till last.
(13) By twelve votes to three,
Decides that the United States of America is under an obligation to make reparation to the Republic of Nicaragua for all injury caused to Nicaragua by the breaches of obligations under customary international law enumerated above;
USA ådöms att ersätta Nicaragua för den förstörelse man orsakat landet, och som strider mot internationell lag.
(14) By fourteen votes to one,
Decides that the United States of America is under an obligation to make reparation to the Republic of Nicaragua for all injury caused to Nicaragua by the breaches of the Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation between the Parties signed at Managua on 21 January 1956;
USA tilldöms att ersätta Nicaragua för det man åsamkat landet, och som strider mot pakten från 1956.
De två sista paragraferna, 15 och 16, uppmanar parterna att uppfylla det domstolen ådömt dem, och sedan arbeta för en normalisering och fredlig samexistens.
Du kanske förstår efter detta, varför USA inte vill erkänna den nya domstolen. För samma dag dom gör det så är deras presidenter och administrationer anklagade av en rad folkrättsexperter för brott mot mänskligheten. Det vet dom i USA, därför vågar de inte ta det steget! USA är ingen normal stat - det är en fascistoid statsbildning från början till slut. 8)
